
My new favorite Buffett...Jimmy!
– Bull E
Warren Buffett recently testified to the FCIC about Moody’s involvement in the financial debacle of late. Meekly (he is a billionaire and I a mere student), I disagree with Buffett’s assertion that the rating agency was just as blind as the rest of the world and therefore its CEO shouldn’t be responsible or even be fired. See my other post about this here.
That is a ridiculous way to view this scenario. Moody’s entire existence is justified only because it is supposed to see through the cooked books and junk bonds and warn investors and creditors of shaky bonds. That is what they do. They failed…immensely. Buffett seems to be saying that it’s OK that they failed because everyone else did too.
What? Really?
The difference, Mr. Buffett, is that the CEO of Moody’s is paid very handsomely to tell me the credit worthiness of a particular debt. Buffet seems to be comfortable knowing that Moody’s (S & P as well) is nothing more than an aggregator for public sentiment. That is a huge problem. If that is what they have become then they need to be explicit in stating that fact.
Of course, Buffett’s 19.6% ownership of Moody’s is not why he takes this position. Right.
I don’t know the answer here on what the best tactic moving forward is though. Should we move the cost of the rating agency to the consumer? Of course, that would encourage under-rating debt and lower the capital raising abilities of good companies. Should they be paid for by the government (I shudder internally at that thought)? What say you, faithful Pulpit readers?